Connecting the Dots. What Will Be On New PJM Lines?

What Will Be On New PJM Lines? (stoppathwv.com)

PJM Interconnection is the grid planner for the Mid-Atlantic region.  PJM’s job is to keep the grid reliable and the electricity markets competitive.  When load increases in PJM’s region without a corresponding increase in generation of electricity, reliability suffers.  When reliability is threatened, PJM springs into action and plans new transmission to solve the impending crisis.  If PJM did not act, we’d soon experience brown outs and black outs and the whole PJM system would crash.  The most logical solution for PJM would be to order new generation near sources of increased load.  However, PJM cannot order new generation, it can only order new transmission.  Electric generation is a market-based, competitive endeavor.  If demand increases prices in a certain load pocket, then the generation market receives a signal that it would be profitable for new generation to build for that load.  It works, in theory, but sadly not in practice.  PJM’s  reliability focused transmission planners never let the market work to spur new generation.  When prices increase, or reliability issues crop up on the horizon, PJM orders new transmission to solve the problem before any new generators are even contemplated.  PJM complains about the loss of baseload generation without replacement, but fails to acknowledge its own role in creating the problem.

Over the past decade or so, Northern Virginia has become the data center capital of the country.  Data centers use a LOT of electricity.  This recent article says that Amazon data centers in Northern Virginia use half as much electricity as New York City every day, and 35% more than the entire power grid of the company’s hometown city of Seattle.  That’s a huge electric load currently being built out in Northern Virginia without a corresponding increase in electric generation.  PJM says the data centers are creating a reliability issue and it has opened a request for proposals to solve it using transmission.  The goal is to export a whole bunch of electricity to Northern Virginia, and PJM’s utility members wasted no time in creating new transmission lines that would connect the generators they own to Northern Virginia.

 

Picture

 

One such proposal from FirstEnergy envisions two new 500kV lines from West Virginia to a substation in Frederick County, Maryland.  Other utilities have proposed new lines from that substation to Northern Virginia, completing the new extension cords.

Extension cords are exactly what these new transmission lines are.  They plug in at struggling FirstEnergy-owned electric generators in West Virginia and provide a pathway for additional electricity generated in West Virginia to power the data centers in Northern Virginia.

The map shows the northern line of this proposal beginning at Fort Martin, West Virginia.  Fort Martin is the location of FirstEnergy’s coal-fired Ft. Martin Power Station.

 

Picture

 

The plant uses more than 2.8 million tons of coal annually and at full capacity the plant’s generating units can produce more than 26 million kilowatt-hours of electricity daily.  Read more here.

Of course, nobody wants coal-fired electricity any more and FirstEnergy has been toying with closing or selling some of these plants.  And then the PJM serendipity fairy arrived!  PJM needs transmission to bring a new supply of power to No. Va., and FirstEnergy can bolster the future economic success of its failing generators by connecting it to data center load.  And FirstEnergy’s proposal was born.

The southern line of FirstEnergy’s proposal is shown on the map as beginning at Pruntytown, WV.  Pruntytown is a gigantic substation where many electric generators in the area connect to the grid.  One such plant is FirstEnergy’s Harrison Power Station in Haywood, West Virginia.

 

Picture

 

Harrison uses more than five million tons of coal annually and at full capacity the plant’s generating units can produce over 47 million kilowatt-hours of electricity daily.  Read more about Harrison here.  FirstEnergy’s bottom line wins again with this proposal!

But did anyone ask Northern Virginia if they wanted to import dirty coal-fired electricity from West Virginia to power their data centers?  PJM?  FirstEnergy?  Dominion?  These entities are going to have a really hard time selling this to a community with clean energy goals and aspirations.  The D.C. metro area is so worried about climate change that they have closed many fossil fuel generators in their own neighborhoods.  Why would these people just look the other way and shrug about increasing their carbon footprint every time they turn on the light switch?  Would local governments in Northern Virginia keep approving new data centers that need power if they knew they were increasing regional air pollution?  Where’s the tipping point here?

In addition to the burning of more coal to produce more electricity in West Virginia, FirstEnergy’s proposals also plan on hundreds of miles of new transmission rights of way across private property between West Virginia and Northern Virginia.  None of these affected landowners need this new electric supply.  It’s simply passing through on its way to corporate users in D.C.’s growing urban sprawl.

Of course, FirstEnergy’s proposal is only one of 72 that PJM received.  Other utilities have proposed connecting their nuclear and gas fired power stations in south eastern Pennsylvania to the data center load via new transmission lines.  Numerous proposals begin at the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station in Delta, PA and the gas-fired York Energy Center in the same town.  Still other proposals want to connect the data center load to American Electric Power’s massive 765kV transmission system in the Ohio Valley, where numerous fossil fuel plants are struggling to survive.  See the 765 lines on this map:

 

Picture

 

The endpoint of AEP’s 765kV system in Virginia is at a substation called Joshua Falls.  New lines beginning at Joshua Falls connect to the data center load as shown on this proposal map submitted to PJM by AEP subsidiary Transource.

 
Picture

Northern Virginia communities need to go into this new power supply for their data centers with their eyes wide open.  Are all the “benefits” they are receiving from the massive data center build out worth increasing their carbon footprint?  Why are other communities in rural areas hundreds of miles from the data centers being forced to sacrifice their land and in some instances, the very air they breathe, so that Northern Virginia counties can increase their tax revenue and their sprawl?  If these counties are receiving all the benefits from the data center buildout, shouldn’t they also step up and shoulder the negative impacts by building new coal, gas, and nuclear power stations in their own communities?

There has to be a better solution than this!