Planning commission recommends looser regulations on open space, wildlife corridors, preservation of Civil War sites
- By Jill Palermo Times Staff Writer
- Updated
Prince William County’s draft plan for the Prince William Digital Gateway envisions a 2,100-acre data center corridor next to the Manassas National Battlefield Park and Conway Memorial State Forest that would allow up to 27.6 million square feet of data center space – likely spread across dozens of buildings – while also dedicating about 800 acres to new parks and trails, protecting historic assets and mitigating harmful impacts on wildlife and the Occoquan Reservoir.
But some of those goals are already being chipped away by data center developers seeking permission to build new data centers within the site.
That’s because included in the Prince William County Planning Commission’s Sept. 15 pre-dawn vote to advance a comprehensive plan amendment for the new data center corridor were numerous changes detailed in a 31-page letter from lawyers representing QTS and Compass, two data center operators seeking to rezone more than 800 acres each in the corridor for new data centers.
Among other things, the letter seeks to reduce a proposed 60-acre park planned to separate the data centers from the battlefield by 15 to 20 acres. It also eliminates one of two wildlife corridors in the study area and takes out language stipulating that wildlife corridors should be a minimum of 300 feet in width – meaning no particular size will be required.
The QTS and Compass letter also removes automatic protections for a suspected Civil War mass burial site and the “Pageland II” homesite, two of several historic resources in the area that county staff’s plan recommends be preserved “in place.”
As justification for weakening developers’ obligations regarding the historic sites, the letter says the county “unreasonably and prematurely assumes” that Pageland II and the Civil War mass burial site are worth preserving. It notes the Pageland II homesite has been deemed ineligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, and it calls the mass burial site “an alleged, as-never-documented, unlocated mass burial site.”